The willingness to choose authentic attachment over socially acceptable partnerships, challenging internalized voices that dictate 'appropriate' partners.
Mirabai's choices scandalized her society: a widow openly singing and dancing in public devotion, writing about divine love with erotic intensity, rejecting marriage to a king. Her willingness to violate convention in service of her truth offers profound teaching about attachment patterns shaped by social approval-seeking. Many insecure attachment styles develop from sacrificing authentic desire for social acceptability: people in wrong partnerships because they look good from outside, anxious people who fear judgment more than they trust their instincts, avoidant people who've learned that needing anything is shameful. Mirabai's example suggests that secure attachment requires examining which partnership choices you're making for social legitimacy rather than genuine alignment. Are you with this person because they're appropriate by external standards? Do you avoid partnership because it would violate some internalized rule? Are you attracted to people your family/peers approve of rather than people who truly move you? The courage to transgress isn't about recklessness but about distinguishing between internalized voices of propriety and your authentic wisdom. This doesn't guarantee unconventional choices, but it ensures your attachments are consciously chosen rather than inherited from cultural scripts.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.