Using deliberate paradox and humor to notice what naturalistic science overlooks, revealing hidden assumptions in how we interpret the physical world.
Nasreddin Hodja's tradition teaches that the sharpest insights emerge when we ask seemingly foolish questions about obvious things. The Absurd Observation Method applies this to scientific naturalism by encouraging practitioners to examine natural phenomena with playful skepticism—noticing what appears self-evident yet remains unexamined. When Hodja asks why the moon follows him on walks, he exposes our assumptions about perception and observer bias. In scientific naturalism as spirituality, this practice reveals how materialist interpretations can become dogmatic. By playfully questioning the 'obvious'—why does consciousness observe nature? what assumptions underpin 'natural'?—we deepen our actual empirical humility. This transforms scientific study from mechanical information-gathering into contemplative practice, where wonder and rigorous observation become inseparable.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.