Periagoge
Concept
1 min read

The Economics of Useless Love

Exploring how companion animals represent love without utility, examining what this teaches about value, purpose, and the examined life's relationship to productivity.

Nas
Why It Matters

Nasreddin frequently found himself economically disadvantaged by his own choices, and rather than resolving this through practical efficiency, he continued living according to his values. Companion animals represent perhaps the purest expression of useless love in modern life: we invest resources and attention on creatures who produce no economic return. In a productivity-obsessed world, this is profoundly radical. The examined joyful life means asking: what does it mean that I love something with no utilitarian purpose? Your pet cannot advance your career, increase your wealth, or serve your ambitions. They simply are. By practicing love toward a being with no reciprocal economic value, you exercise a form of freedom. You learn that love doesn't require justification through usefulness. This framework invites examination of how much of your life remains tied to productivity metrics, and what it feels like to invest completely in the useless. Nasreddin would recognize in pet ownership a form of wisdom: the willingness to spend on what has no return except presence and joy. In this, companion animals teach an essential lesson about value beyond utility.

Helpful guides
Nas
Play & Joy
Peri
Questions about The Economics of Useless Love?

Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.

Ready to work on The Economics of Useless Love?

Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.