Embracing the apparent foolishness of prioritizing animal companionship in a world that values human productivity and status.
Nasreddin positioned himself as the fool—not the wise sage dispensing knowledge from above but the humble figure who appears foolish while revealing truth. In modern culture, the time and resources devoted to companion animals can appear foolish: feeding and walking and playing with creatures that contribute nothing to economic output or social status. Yet Nasreddin would celebrate this apparent foolishness as profound wisdom. To care for a companion animal despite social pressure toward 'productive' use of time is to choose what truly matters over what merely appears important. This is the fool's privilege: to ask the embarrassing question, to live the obvious truth others ignore. When we prioritize our cat's comfort over a work email, choose our dog's walk over social climbing, we practice the fool's humility. We admit that something—presence, relationship, play—matters more than status. Nasreddin's tradition invites us to examine why this feels foolish, exposing the examined life's radical reorientation: away from accomplishment toward being, away from achievement toward companionship. The fool who loves animals is perhaps the wisest among us.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.