Examining how animals are both useful and useless, challenging our instrumental thinking about relationships and companionship.
Many Nasreddin stories hinge on paradoxes of utility: he does something that appears useless but proves essential, or essential but proves worthless. Modern companion animals occupy this paradoxical space perfectly. A dog provides security yet creates anxiety, offers unconditional presence yet demands constant care, gives nothing of economic value yet transforms everything about how we value. This concept examines our conflicted relationship with animal usefulness. We adopted companion animals partly because we stopped needing them for survival—they became luxury, entertainment, emotional support. Yet they remain deeply useful, just not in ways we can easily quantify or control. The examined life requires honest acknowledgment: why do we keep these animals? What are we actually getting, and what are we trying to avoid seeing? Nasreddin's tradition reveals that the most profound usefulness emerges from embracing apparent uselessness. A cat accomplishes nothing yet teaches presence. A rabbit achieves no goals yet offers meditation. By surrendering our need for companions to be instrumentally useful, we discover a different utility—the cultivation of attention, tenderness, and acceptance that transforms us.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.