The recognition that our desire to control and protect nature often reflects the same ego that harms it, requiring us to hold opposing truths simultaneously.
Nasreddin Hodja delighted in paradoxes—situations where opposing truths exist together without resolution. The Paradox of Stewardship applies this wisdom to our relationship with animals: we genuinely care about protecting them, yet our protection schemes often serve human interests disguised as animal welfare. We build sanctuaries that are really museums; we regulate hunting while ignoring habitat destruction. The Hodja teaches us to sit with this uncomfortable duality rather than resolve it through false certainty. True ethical relationship with nature requires acknowledging that even our best intentions are entangled with our need for control. This paradoxical awareness prevents us from becoming self-righteous while still pursuing meaningful change, holding both our genuine compassion and our inevitable complicity.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.