Using the Hodja's method of asking innocent-seeming questions that expose moral discomfort, making visible what we've learned not to see about animal suffering.
The Hodja asks questions that seem simple, even stupid, yet reveal that nothing is simple. 'If the chicken feels pain when I cook it, why am I cooking it?' 'If the dog deserves freedom, why doesn't the pig?' 'If we call ourselves animal lovers, what love is this?' These questions don't judge; they simply illuminate. Applied to animal ethics, this method resists both righteous certainty and comfortable denial. Rather than declaring people evil for eating meat or using animals, the Hodja's approach asks each person to sit with their own contradictions—the discomfort of cognitive dissonance that precedes genuine change. By refusing to let us hide behind rationalization, these questions create space for authentic ethical reckoning. The discomfort itself becomes the teacher, more powerful than any argument.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.