How groups built on shared favoritism (us vs. them) offer false belonging and extract loyalty at the cost of wider compassion and integrity.
Favoritism creates a seductive narrative: we are special, chosen, part of something exclusive. This feels like belonging. Religious communities, elite circles, friend groups—all can organize around shared favoritism toward insiders and dismissal of outsiders. The psychological benefit is real: you feel seen, included, safe. The cost is that this belonging is conditional and fragile. You must remain useful to the group, must police your own behavior to maintain status, must participate in the shared dismissal of outsiders. Rabia resisted this temptation fiercely. Her love was radically inclusive; she refused to create insider groups that excluded others. This concept examines how favoritism offers the illusion of belonging while actually creating isolation. True community, in Rabia's vision, doesn't require insiders and outsiders—it requires commitment to principles larger than group preference. When organizations examine why they've become cliquish, why certain people have permanent favor, why dissent is treated as betrayal, they're often discovering that they've organized around false belonging. Breaking this pattern feels terrifying because the false belonging was comforting. But the alternative is genuine community based on shared values rather than shared enemies.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.