The psychological tension between intimate love for known others and universal love for humanity—favoritism's existential dilemma in Rabia's tradition.
Rabia's intense personal devotion to God didn't translate into distant universal love; it burned as particular, consuming passion. Yet her teaching resists favoritism's trap of reserving that intensity only for in-group members. This creates a genuine tension: humans have finite capacity for intimate knowledge and care; we naturally love those close to us more intensely than distant strangers. Favoritism exploits this fact, transforming natural attachment into exclusionary preference-making. The problem deepens in communities: families show favoritism to their children, organizations to their members, nations to their citizens. Rabia's response wasn't to deny particular love but to purify its source. When love flows from divine connection rather than ego-security, it remains particular without becoming tyrannical. A parent can love their child intensely while still honoring the intrinsic worth of all children. This concept invites us to ask: In which relationships do we mistake familiarity for justification for favoritism? Where does our particular love become a weapon against those outside our circle?
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.