Establishing ethical limits on what aspects of a person's life should be digitally preserved, recognizing that some intimacy and privacy remain sacred even after death.
Rabia protected her intimate relationship with the Divine from public scrutiny, maintaining sacred boundaries even within community. When considering what to preserve digitally, boundaries of sacred data become essential ethical work. Not everything about a person should be captured, archived, or made accessible—some memories, communications, and experiences deserve to remain private, forgotten, or die with the person. Decisions about digital preservation require asking: what did this person wish to be known? What aspects of their being were meant for intimate circles only? What right do survivors have to expose vulnerabilities the living person kept hidden? These questions resist the technological impulse toward total documentation and comprehensive data capture. They honor the deceased by respecting their dignity and the limits they set around their own privacy. Sacred data boundaries recognize that true honoring sometimes means allowing things to be lost.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.