A framework examining how favoritism in resource allocation (time, attention, opportunities, wealth) perpetuates inequality and violates Rabia's principle of radical generosity.
Rabia famously gave away everything she possessed, maintaining she couldn't simultaneously love wealth and love the divine—that hoarding was a form of denial. This principle extends to all resources: time, attention, emotional energy, opportunity. Favoritism creates an economy of scarcity where we ration our gifts to the favored few while the many go without. We give our best hours to work we enjoy; our full attention to charming people; our mentorship to those who remind us of ourselves; our invitations to the already-connected. This creates compounding advantage: the favored accumulate resources while the excluded remain depleted. Rabia's alternative economy operated on radical redistribution. She extended herself equally, conscious that her time belonged to all who sought her. The cost of the favoritism economy is invisibly high: talented people never develop because no one invested in them; lonely people remain isolated because they weren't in the right circle; potential innovations never emerge because opportunities cluster among the already-advantaged. By examining our resource allocation—asking whether our giving patterns reflect love or fear, abundance or scarcity—we can begin shifting toward Rabia's model. This isn't guilt-based redistribution but recognition that our gifts multiply through circulation, not hoarding.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.