How favoritism distorts what we pass forward to future generations, corrupting the inheritance we intend to leave.
Rabia's legacy is not a dynasty or a favored lineage but a teaching that transcended her lifetime and rippled across centuries and cultures. She left no institutional power base, no anointed successor. Instead, she left a practice—a way of loving and being—that anyone could inherit. Favoritism corrupts legacy by teaching the next generation that worth is distributed unequally, that some people matter more, that access and belonging are prizes to be competed for. When leaders show favoritism, they model for their communities that injustice is normal and that personal relationship trumps principle. The cost extends generationally: children of favored members learn entitlement, others internalize diminishment. By contrast, Rabia's model of treating all seekers with equal spiritual attention created a legacy of inclusivity that outlived her by centuries. The practice here is to examine: what are you actually modeling and transmitting? If you disappeared tomorrow, would your organization continue the patterns you've embedded, or would it require active intervention to perpetuate them? A legacy free of favoritism is one that strengthens rather than divides the communities it touches.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.