A reflective practice for examining whether our choices and preferences serve our own interests or serve something beyond ourselves.
Rabia's spiritual practice included rigorous self-examination of intention—the question 'Why am I choosing this? Who does this serve?' This is a diagnostic tool for favoritism, which thrives in the blind spots of self-deception. We favor people while telling ourselves it's merit-based. We give preference while insisting it's necessary. The mirror of intention requires honest investigation: Am I choosing this person because they're truly best, or because they're like me? Am I allocating resources because of actual need, or because of relationship? Am I making exceptions because circumstances require it, or because this person matters more to me? This practice is uncomfortable because it reveals how often we rationalize preference. The cost of unexamined intention is that favoritism becomes invisible, systemic, justified. By creating spaces where people regularly examine their own motivations—in families, organizations, communities—we make favoritism harder to sustain. When intention becomes visible, when we must articulate why we're choosing someone, fairness naturally increases. This practice doesn't eliminate preference but makes it conscious and accountable rather than automatic and hidden.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.