The distinction between genuine commitment and the possessive attachment that favoritism represents, drawn from Rabia's model of loving without clinging.
Rabia taught that attachment—the grasping, possessive form of love—is fundamentally different from pure devotion, which is free and spacious. Favoritism is attachment's shadow expression. When we favor someone, we are not showing pure love but rather a possessive bond rooted in fear, ego, or need. A parent's favoritism toward one child often masks anxiety about that child's vulnerability or a projection of the parent's own unfulfilled dreams. A leader's favoritism reflects insecurity about their own competence. Pure devotion, by contrast, offers support without requiring return or loyalty. It celebrates another's flourishing without needing them to remain dependent. Rabia's life exemplified this: her love extended to all beings without demanding reciprocity or exclusive relationship. This teaching directly illuminates how favoritism costs us in terms of authentic presence. We cannot be fully present to anyone when we are managing a hierarchy of preferences. Breaking free from favoritism means practicing the discipline of devotion without attachment—being fully committed to each person's wellbeing without possession. This is the paradoxical freedom Rabia's tradition offers: the more we release the need for favorites, the more deeply we can love.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.