A framework for recognizing when devotion to people or causes becomes contaminated by personal preference rather than universal principle.
Rabia distinguished between pure devotion—motivated by love itself—and tainted devotion, which serves ego, tribal loyalty, or personal gain. Favoritism emerges exactly at this boundary: it claims to be loyalty but is actually preference dressed as principle. In organizations and families, pure devotion asks 'who needs help most?' while favoritism asks 'who do I prefer to help?' Rabia's practice was to examine her own motivations ruthlessly, asking whether her actions flowed from love or from attachment. Applied to modern life, this concept invites us to audit our choices: Are we favoring a colleague because they're genuinely more qualified, or because they remind us of someone we love? Do we give more attention to certain community members from principle or from comfort? Pure devotion requires ongoing self-examination, separating authentic commitment from the unconscious preferences that masquerade as loyalty.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.