The practice of examining whether discipline stems from love of the child's growth or from parental anger, control, or vindication.
Rabia taught that actions are judged by intention—serving God from love is infinitely more valuable than serving from fear. This principle transforms how parents approach discipline. Authoritarian punishment often masks parental dysregulation: anger seeking outlets, shame seeking victims, or insecurity seeking dominance. Authoritative discipline, aligned with Rabia's teaching, requires parents to examine intention before responding. Is this boundary set because the child needs guidance, or because I need to feel powerful? Is this consequence designed to teach, or to punish? Pure intention means the parent has metabolized their own fear and anger, approaching discipline as sacred work of formation rather than reaction. This clarity allows children to hear correction without shame-binding, to understand consequences as information rather than rejection. Over time, children internalize not rules, but the parent's commitment to their flourishing—and they extend that same intentional love to others and to themselves.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.