Examining parental motives—whether rules serve the child's growth or the parent's convenience—reveals the difference between authoritative guidance and authoritarian control.
Rabia taught that intention determines spiritual worth; an act done from ego differs fundamentally from one done from pure devotion. Applied to parenting, this means examining why a rule exists. Authoritarian rules often protect parental ego, convenience, or status ('because I said so'). Authoritative rules serve the child's development: learning delayed gratification, safety, respect, or skill. When parents clarify their intention—Am I enforcing this for my child's growth or my control?—they naturally shift toward authoritative approaches. Rules become transparent: 'We don't hit because it hurts others and we're a family that protects each other.' Children who understand the intention behind boundaries develop wisdom, not mere obedience. Rabia's insistence on purity of heart suggests that parental authority loses its spiritual and psychological legitimacy when divorced from genuine care for the child's becoming. This self-examination prevents the creeping authoritarianism that unconscious parents often inherit.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.