A paradox in Sufi epistemology where deepest knowledge emerges from surrender of the knowing mind's authority.
Rumi teaches that there is a 'knowledge' that transcends the rational mind's capacity to grasp. In Arabic, 'ilm (rational knowledge) differs from 'irfan (direct knowing). This distinction becomes crucial when navigating belief and doubt. The rational mind creates doubt by comparing beliefs against logical criteria. But 'irfan—direct experiential knowing—operates through participation rather than analysis. This concept invites a shift in epistemology: instead of asking 'Can I rationally justify my belief?' ask 'What does my deepest nature know to be true?' These are different kinds of knowing. Rumi's poetry frequently describes a consciousness that exceeds logical boundaries: 'I have become the lover of not-knowing.' This is not anti-intellectual but trans-rational. For practitioners, this opens space for honoring both doubt (the rational mind's honest limitation) and faith (the deeper mind's recognition). It suggests that some truths cannot be resolved at the level where doubt operates; they require a shift in consciousness itself.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.