Creating economic frameworks that measure success by human dignity flourishing rather than aggregate growth benefiting concentrated wealth.
Conventional economics treats GDP growth as success, even when that growth concentrates in fewer hands and leaves most people with constrained possibilities. Yacob's emphasis on dignity as fundamental suggests alternative economic metrics: What percentage of people can develop their intellectual capacities? How many are freed from desperate necessity? Can people make meaningful choices about their lives? Are communities able to govern their own futures? Do economic arrangements respect the intrinsic worth of every person? These measures would show that high-GDP, high-concentration economies often fail fundamentally—they sacrifice universal dignity for concentrated accumulation. This concept proposes dignity economics as an alternative framework: an economic system should be judged not by total output but by whether it enables dignified human flourishing across the entire population. A slower-growing economy where most people have security, agency, and opportunity to develop capacities serves human purposes better than rapid growth concentrating in elite hands. Implementing dignity economics would require different business models, different measures of value, different definitions of progress. It would mean asking not 'how can we grow the economy?' but 'how can we arrange production and distribution to honor the dignity and develop the capacities of all involved?'
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.