A practice where affected communities engage in reasoned dialogue to determine cause priorities, rather than experts alone deciding what problems merit altruistic focus.
Zera Yacob developed his philosophy through solitary reflection but ultimately valued the power of shared reasoning. This concept applies that insight to effective altruism's cause selection: rather than allowing researchers and strategists to unilaterally determine where altruism flows, affected communities should participate in the reasoning process. A participatory approach means communities experiencing poverty, disease, or injustice engage in structured dialogue with effective altruists to articulate their own priorities and problem definitions. This honors both Yacob's commitment to reason and his belief that dignity requires agency. Such participation might reveal that communities prioritize different outcomes than external metrics suggest—perhaps cultural preservation alongside economic development, or political voice alongside material aid. Participatory reason also builds trust and improves solution quality by incorporating local knowledge. This shifts effective altruism from a parachute model (experts descend with solutions) to a partnership model grounded in mutual reasoning and shared authority over definitions of impact.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.