HR documents often contradict themselves across time—what was flagged as a performance concern in one memo gets recharacterized differently in a later email or review, or commitments made in writing get silently abandoned. Mapping these inconsistencies creates a factual baseline for understanding what actually happened versus what the official narrative claims.
Narrative consistency mapping is the process of analyzing a series of HR documents, emails, or verbal summaries to identify whether the story being told about an employee remains logically and factually consistent over time. When managers or HR representatives shift their explanations, change the timeline, or alter the stated reasons for a decision, those inconsistencies can reveal pretextual or retaliatory motivations.
AI tools can systematically compare documents across months or years, flagging places where the stated rationale changes or contradicts earlier communications. This gives employees concrete, organized evidence when challenging disciplinary actions, demotions, or terminations.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.