The Taoist principle that 'the named Tao is not the eternal Tao' reveals how naming technologies creates false certainty and obscures systemic consequences.
Laozi opens the Tao Te Ching with the paradox that naming the infinite limits it. When we name something 'clean energy' or 'sustainable technology,' we create an illusion of understanding that prevents deeper questioning. Solar panels are named 'renewable' but their panels degrade, creating e-waste. Artificial intelligence is named 'intelligent' but operates without wisdom or foresight about consequences. By naming solutions, we believe we've solved problems. The Taoist approach names carefully and holds names lightly, always aware that the map is not the territory. In climate technology, this means resisting the marketing language that forecloses inquiry: questioning what 'net zero' actually means, interrogating who benefits from 'carbon credits,' examining what 'sustainable development' sustains. The deepest technological wisdom knows what cannot be named until proven through lived experience.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.