The counterintuitive insight that resisting AI tools may strengthen you more than adopting them, by preserving capability and independence.
Laozi teaches that resistance often generates the conditions for strength: the willow that bends survives the storm, the empty cup receives water. Paradoxically, consciously choosing not to use AI in certain domains can be the strongest decision. Over-reliance on tools atrophies human capability in critical areas—judgment, pattern recognition, creativity, resilience. The Taoist approach isn't anti-technology but pro-consequence-awareness. By strategically maintaining human-only practices in key areas, you preserve optionality. If all your writing flows through an AI system, what happens when it fails? What capabilities do you lose? Laozi would suggest that strength comes from having viable alternatives, from knowing you can function without the tool. This creates psychological freedom—you use the tool because you choose to, not because you're dependent on it. Intentional resistance in specific domains can be more valuable than blanket adoption. The practice: identify one critical skill you'll maintain without AI assistance, and practice it deliberately. This preserves your humanity and your resilience.
Peri can explain this concept, give practical examples, help you decide whether it applies to your situation, or recommend a journey if appropriate.
Explore related journeys or tell Peri what you're working through.