Talk it through with Aurelius
Library›Aurelius›The problem
Aurelius · Work & Leadership
Knowledge + Guidance

I'm suddenly in charge of AI at work — now what?

Nobody trained you for this. You were good at your job. Now you also decide what counts as safe AI use. No manual came with the role. No one told you where the real risks sit. This is not a test of your technical knowledge. It is a test of whether you build simple rules before you need them. It is a test of whether you say stop when something looks wrong, even without certainty. Waiting for certainty is how harm gets through. You already know more than you think. You have managed risk before — in people, budgets, mistakes. Those instincts transfer. What you lack is a map of where AI tends to fail. That map takes an afternoon to learn, not a career.

◆ How this problem reads on the two dials
GuidanceKnowledge
Coaching
More to learn
1:1 with AureliusWith others (a Pod)
Mostly you & the coach
A little with peers
The real gap here is a missing map of where AI goes wrong, not missing courage — so teach the shape of responsible use first, then coach the next action.
How the two dials adapt to you →
What’s really going on

You don't need a philosophy of AI. You need three things: a short list of banned uses, a clear path for people to ask before they act, and your own habit of asking 'what could go wrong here' before you approve anything. Build those first. The rest you learn by doing.

🔒 What you’ll build togetherUnlock by starting
A moveWrite down the three uses of AI you would never allow. Do this today, before a crisis forces the decision under pressure.
A moveSet one rule now: no one feeds customer or employee data into an AI tool without asking you first. Enforce it this week.
A moveTake one real decision in front of you and ask: what is the worst outcome if this AI output is wrong? Let the answer decide.
A moveFind the person closest to the actual AI use day to day — not the vendor, not the consultant — and ask what already worries them.
A moveStop waiting to feel ready. Approve or reject the next request using the judgment you already have.

What changes unlock by starting

  • A short written policy you can defend, instead of a philosophy you can't
  • A clear channel for people to ask before they act, instead of guessing
  • Less anxiety, because you've named the few things that actually matter and let the rest go
  • A standing habit of asking 'what's the worst outcome' before you approve anything new

Related problems

One object, two jobs: a public answer to a real problem, and — the moment you start the chat — Aurelius’s live plan for your version of it.