Our AI drafts emails and books meetings now — do we even check it?
Here is what actually happened. Nobody decided this. The tool got smarter, started drafting replies and moving meetings, and your team drifted into one of two postures: ignore it completely, or wave it through unread. Neither is a choice. Both are the absence of one. The tool is not your problem. The missing agreement is. A team that has not named what AI may decide alone will always split into the ignorers and the blind trusters, because nobody told them what else to do. You cannot control what the model does next. You can control whether your team has a written line between "act freely" and "check with us first." That line is within your power today. Draw it.
Choose a third option: not blind trust, not willful blindness. You let a tool act in your name without agreeing what it may decide alone. Fix that gap first. As a team, write down what it can do unsupervised and what it must bring to you. Then check its work on a schedule, not by accident.
What changes unlock by starting
- Your team can state, in one sentence, what the AI may do without review.
- Fewer silent mistakes slip through because someone now checks on a schedule.
- One person is accountable for oversight, instead of everyone and no one.
- The team trusts the tool for the right reasons, not out of habit or fear.