Talk it through with Aurelius
LibraryAureliusThe problem
Aurelius · Work & Leadership
Knowledge + Guidance

Why can't I tell what users say from what they do?

You watch a user click one way, then hear them explain it as if they meant to all along. You write both down side by side, and by evening you can't say which one was real. This is not a gift you're missing. It's a habit you haven't built — keeping the account separate from the event. Your team does this too. Someone says "users loved it" because a tester smiled and said kind things, while the recording shows three failed attempts and a shrug. Don't go looking for more empathy or sharper intuition. You need a method that puts behavior on the page before opinion gets a vote. That's a discipline, not a talent, and you can start today.

◆ How this problem reads on the two dials
GuidanceKnowledge
More coaching
Some to learn
1:1 with AureliusWith others (a Pod)
Some one-to-one
Practise with peers
The team needs a simple method (behavior vs. self-report) taught once, then coached hard until it becomes reflex in real sessions.
How the two dials adapt to you →
What’s really going on

You confuse them because you record what people say and hope it explains what you saw. Stop hoping it lines up. Write the action down first, in plain terms, before a single quote touches the page. Behavior gets first claim on the truth. Opinion speaks second, if at all.

🔒 What you’ll build togetherUnlock by starting
A moveBefore the session ends, write the action in one line with no adjectives — what the hand did, not what the mouth said.
A moveKeep two columns in every note: DID and SAID. Never let one sentence live in both.
A moveBan the phrase 'they felt' in pod reviews until someone points to the exact frame that shows it.
A moveAssign one teammate per session to track only clicks and time, muted, blind to the audio. Compare their notes to whoever tracked speech.
A moveBefore any finding reaches a stakeholder, ask which column it came from. If no one can answer, it doesn't go in the report.
PractiseDID/SAID Split · a Pod of 4 · 30 min

What changes unlock by starting

  • Your reports separate observed behavior from stated opinion, so decisions rest on what happened, not what was claimed.
  • Your pod stops arguing over interpretation because the DID/SAID split settles it on the spot.
  • Stakeholders trust your findings more because you point to the frame, not just the feeling.
  • You catch contradictions between word and action in the room, not three weeks later in a postmortem.
One object, two jobs: a public answer to a real problem, and — the moment you start the chat — Aurelius’s live plan for your version of it.