Why do we need everyone's sign-off before we release anything?
You call it process. Look closer and it is something else: you are spreading the decision across enough people that no single one of you can be blamed if it fails. That is not rigor. That is hiding. This costs you. Work slows. Your team stops trusting its own judgment, because it has learned that no judgment is final until it passes through five more hands. You have built a system that rewards waiting and punishes deciding. You cannot control whether the work succeeds once it is out. You can control how many people must bless it before it leaves the room. Start there. That part is yours.
The approvals are not protecting the work. They are protecting you from blame. See this plainly, then choose: find the one person whose judgment the work actually needs, get their word, and release. Every signature added after that is fear dressed up as diligence.
What changes unlock by starting
- Releases move faster because fewer people must agree first
- Someone on the team can name, clearly, who owns each decision
- The team catches itself adding approvers out of fear, not need
- Anxiety is named directly instead of hidden inside more process