My business partner and I are investors trying to apply rawlsian principles to our portfolio decisions, but we keep disagreeing about whether certain profitable ventures violate the difference principle. She thinks job creation justifies inequality while I think we're just rationalizing exploitation, and we can't seem to bridge this gap.
More people experience this than they realize.
Abstract principles of justice become contested when applied to specific economic decisions with real stakes.
“Where Are You with Rawlsian justice — the thought experiment?”
Peri can explain why this happens, help you decide if this is the right situation for you, and point toward the right journey or coach.
If this sounds familiar, the Library can help you find the bigger picture.