My research partner and I are conducting interviews about criminal justice reform and we keep disagreeing about how to frame the questions — I think we need to push harder on systemic issues while they want to stay 'neutral' and I'm realizing we have fundamentally different ideas about what fair inquiry even means.
More people experience this than they realize.
Two people discovering their methodological differences reflect deeper philosophical divides about objectivity, advocacy, and the ethics of inquiry.
“Where Are You with What is justice — philosophical survey?”
Peri can explain why this happens, help you decide if this is the right situation for you, and point toward the right journey or coach.
If this sounds familiar, the Library can help you find the bigger picture.