Our nonprofit board is using the veil of ignorance to redesign our grant allocation process, but the members who currently benefit from our existing criteria keep finding ways to protect their advantages while claiming they're being impartial. I can see what's happening but calling it out directly feels like it would blow up the whole collaboration.
More people experience this than they realize.
People invoke fairness principles while unconsciously preserving their own positions of benefit.
“Where Are You with Rawlsian justice — the thought experiment?”
Peri can explain why this happens, help you decide if this is the right situation for you, and point toward the right journey or coach.
If this sounds familiar, the Library can help you find the bigger picture.