My adult son and I are both trying to understand climate change science using the Feynman technique because we've been arguing about it, but when he explains the skeptical positions simply I realize some of his doubts are more sophisticated than I thought, and when I explain the consensus science he points out gaps in my understanding that make me less certain than I was.
More people experience this than they realize.
Honest explanation can simultaneously validate the complexity in opposing views while revealing the shakiness in one's own certainties.
“Where Are You with The Feynman technique?”
If this sounds familiar, the Library can help you find the bigger picture.