My business partner and I have been using Socratic questioning to examine our company decisions, but we've discovered that we have completely different ideas about what counts as a good question and when you've examined something enough. Our sessions either go in circles forever or get cut short and I'm not sure we're actually getting clearer about anything.
More people experience this than they realize.
The partners are discovering that the method itself requires shared assumptions about inquiry that they don't possess.
“Where Are You with Socratic dialogue as method?”
Peri can explain why this happens, help you decide if this is the right situation for you, and point toward the right journey or coach.
If this sounds familiar, the Library can help you find the bigger picture.