Periagoge
Scenario

When couples disagree about the moral obligations of charitable giving

My husband and I are arguing about contributing to charity because he wants to research maximum impact while I want to give locally to people we can see, and we're realizing this is about whether money represents rational optimization or human connection. We both want to do good but can't agree on what good means.

More people experience this than they realize.

What we've seen

Partners must examine whether money given to help others should maximize calculated impact or strengthen community bonds.

Your guide for this
Zera
Zera works with people navigating exactly this kind of situation.
Ideas that help explain it
Worth thinking about

“Where Are You with The meaning of money — what it ultimately is?”

Peri

Peri can explain why this happens, help you decide if this is the right situation for you, and point toward the right journey or coach.

If this sounds familiar, the Library can help you find the bigger picture.