Talk it through with Aurelius
Library›Aurelius›The problem
Aurelius · Work & Leadership
Knowledge + Guidance

How do I know if a sales rep will actually perform?

You sit across from someone for an hour. They say the right things. You hire them. Three months later, the interview told you nothing true. This happens because talking about work and doing work are two different skills, and an interview only tests one of them. Your team already knows this. You've all walked out of a great interview, hired the person, and watched the doubt turn out to be right. The problem was never the questions you asked. It was that you never asked the candidate to actually do anything. This is a team problem, not a you problem. Everyone in that interview room is probably judging something different, because nobody agreed, before the candidate walked in, on what good performance actually looks like. Fix that first, and the test writes itself.

◆ How this problem reads on the two dials
GuidanceKnowledge
Coaching
More to learn
1:1 with AureliusWith others (a Pod)
Some one-to-one
Practise with peers
The team needs a method (what a work sample is, how to score it) before they can coach themselves through building and trusting one.
How the two dials adapt to you →
What’s really going on

You cannot predict a person from a conversation. You can only predict them from a test. Stop asking candidates to describe their work. Give them a small piece of the real job, paid, before you hire. Watch what they do with it. Build that test as a team, not around gut feeling.

🔒 What you’ll build togetherUnlock by starting
A moveWith your team, write down the three tasks a rep must do well in their first month — not traits, tasks.
A moveReplace one interview round with a paid work sample: a real call, a real outreach sequence, a real objection.
A moveHave each team member score the sample alone first, then compare notes out loud.
A moveTrack your scores against what the person actually does in their first 90 days, and correct the test.
A moveBan the sentence 'I just liked them' from your hiring debrief. Require evidence instead.
PractiseThe Test Before the Test · a Pod of 4 · 30 min

What changes unlock by starting

  • A written, shared definition of what good looks like, agreed before anyone interviews.
  • A work-sample step in your process that tests output, not charm.
  • Fewer hires who interview well and then underperform.
  • A hiring team that argues about evidence instead of gut feeling.
One object, two jobs: a public answer to a real problem, and — the moment you start the chat — Aurelius’s live plan for your version of it.