Why does my process hold on some deals and vanish on others?
You call it flexibility. Examine it plainly: flexibility means choosing the right step for the situation. What you describe is skipping the step that is hardest for you, in the deals where it matters most. That is not adapting the method. That is abandoning it under pressure. Notice when the lapses happen. Is it the difficult buyer? The deal where you already feel behind? The step that exposes you to rejection? The pattern is not random. It will point straight at the discomfort you are avoiding, if you look. You cannot control whether a deal is easy or hard. You can control whether you run the method anyway. That is the whole matter. Stop asking whether the method works. Ask instead why you only trust it when it costs you nothing.
The method is not inconsistent. You are. You follow it when the deal is easy or the buyer is likable, and you drop it when the deal is hard or uncomfortable. Call that what it is — avoidance, not judgment. Find the step you skip most. That is where the work is.
What changes unlock by starting
- You will see exactly which deals and which steps you cut corners on.
- You will stop mistaking discomfort for discretion.
- Your results on hard deals improve once you stop skipping the method there.
- You will have a plain record of your own pattern, instead of a vague sense that you're inconsistent.