The role asks you to defend things you doubt, say things you don't believe, or do things that go against what you know is right — and each one is small enough to explain away. The misread is that this is just the price of being a professional. The real move isn't silent compliance or a dramatic exit — it's naming your line clearly, so you know when you're getting close to it and what crossing it would actually cost.
You can distinguish the honest compromises of any collective endeavor from the ones that are slowly rewriting your character.
The individual versions of this pattern people actually bring — start with the one closest to you.
Guides on this pattern, each one a conversation you can start rather than an article you read.
Working through “Reckon With What the Work Asks of You”?
Talk it through with Aurelius, and start where it actually helps.