Why does every comp plan I design get gamed somehow?
You built the plan. Now someone found the edge of it — the place where hitting the number stops matching the real goal. This is not a flaw you missed. It is what every incentive does, sooner or later. You and your team keep searching for the version with no gaps. There isn't one. People are smarter than formulas. They will always find the shortest path to the reward you wrote down. The real question is not how to close every gap before launch. It's whether your team has agreed, in advance, what you'll do when a gap gets found.
Every plan has gaps. You cannot design them away — only decide, as a team, what happens when one is found. Stop hunting for the perfect formula. Build the review instead. The gap is not the failure. Ignoring it together is.
What changes unlock by starting
- A shared, written list of the plan's known weak points.
- A standing process for catching gaps, instead of patching them once and moving on.
- Less blame on one person when a loophole surfaces, because the team expected it.
- A plan reviewed on a schedule, not only after someone gets hurt by it.