LibraryScenariosRestorative justice — theory and practice
Scenarios
Philosophical

Restorative justice — theory and practice

Restorative justice as a formal practice — victim-offender mediation, community conferencing, restorative circles — draws on Indigenous traditions of conflict resolution that have existed for millennia and were largely displaced by colonial legal systems that prioritized state authority over community healing. The evidence on its effectiveness, where it has been implemented seriously, is consistently positive: higher satisfaction for victims, lower recidivism for offenders, stronger communities. The obstacle to its wider adoption is rarely empirical but political: punishment also serves social functions — scapegoating, ritual exclusion — that are not about rehabilitation at all.

Juana
Juana
Online
The coach is replying
40 scenarios
How to face the people you harmed after stealingHow to prepare for victim-offender dialogueHow to repair harm when apologies aren't enoughHow trauma survivors navigate pressure to forgiveWhen abusers weaponize restorative justice rhetoricWhen activist groups debate whether incremental change undermines transformational goalsWhen co-facilitators have different approaches to power dynamics in restorative processesWhen community organizers have conflicting visions of systemic changeWhen community pressure conflicts with personal harmWhen families disagree about engaging with offendersWhen family pressure demands impossible healingWhen institutional committees struggle to balance individual cases and systemic changeWhen intergenerational groups navigate tradition and adaptation in healing practicesWhen nonprofit partners disagree about growth and impact measurementWhen offenders impose their healing on victimsWhen parents disagree about applying restorative justice with their own childrenWhen parents disagree with restorative approachesWhen parents must account for children's harmWhen personal boundaries contradict professional valuesWhen public accountability conflicts with survival needsWhen public shaming becomes performative redemptionWhen restorative justice facilitators disagree about process and outcomesWhen restorative justice feels culturally imposedWhen restorative justice ignores racial contextWhen restorative justice ignores systemic inequalityWhen restorative justice practitioners disagree about prerequisites for participationWhen restorative processes reveal deeper family traumaWhen schools offer restorative justice for sexual assaultWhen students game restorative systemsWhen survivor voices challenge established restorative justice practicesWhen unwanted apologies retraumatize survivorsWhy offenders struggle with victim forgivenessWhy relationship repair feels like settlingWhy restorative approaches feel futile with intimate violenceWhy restorative justice advocates question their beliefsWhy restorative justice facilitators burn outWhy restorative justice workers lose hopeWhy some victims seek connection with offendersWhy workplace restorative justice fails without power analysisWhy workplace restorative justice feels insufficient